Concluding remarks

Analyzing the array of pressures, especially the sanctions set against the Russian Federation and its citizens post-Kremlin’s actions in Ukraine, one can contend that the Western community’s response was foreseeable.

At their core, these sanctions were more symbolic, underlining the West’s allegiance with Ukraine at a time when NATO’s comprehensive military and political support for Kyiv was yet to be determined. This hurried enactment unfortunately bore signs of legal and bureaucratic miscalculations. At various points, these non-military interventions were designed to persuade the Russian government’s direction. However, as the futility of this shift became evident, the aim transitioned towards destabilizing Russia’s economy.

Our analysis underlines the following:
01
Firstly, sanctions truly hold weight when they are nearly universal, having the backing of the global majority. Sanctions by isolated nations or blocs seldom achieve their goals. There’s even an argument that such sanctions might inadvertently harm the instigator more than the recipient, creating opportunities for neutral countries to profit.
02
Secondly, the current sanction strategy displays clear inconsistencies. Various loopholes have been maintained for both “humanitarian” and trade-based motives. The enactment of energy sanctions on Russia were procrastinated and seem porous at best. Meanwhile, little effort was made to disrupt Russian enterprises and officialdom’s global interactions.
03
Thirdly, the sanctions have inherent weak spots, allowing Russia to easily navigate around them. A significant issue is the inconsistent approach towards third-party countries that provide Russia with avenues to sidestep these restrictions. Through strategic acquisitions from the West via third-party nations and shell entities, Russia has showcased the deficiencies of the existing trade order in dealing with nations that dismiss global norms.
04
Fourthly, a distinction between sectoral and individual sanctions has come to light. While sectoral sanctions aim to deter, personal sanctions appear punitive, targeting individuals due to prolonged association with the regime. This approach, while flouting several legal principles, also blurs the differentiation between varied offender groups, inadvertently fostering a united front.
05
Prominently, the most strategic move against Russia would have been to allure defectors with their resources, skills, and insider information. Yet, the sanctions, further aggravated by overzealous regulations, have had the paradoxical effect of fortifying internal loyalty.
06
Lastly, the war has shifted global perceptions towards Russians, eerily reminiscent of the views held for Germans during the World Wars. This renewed application of collective liability has led to discrimination against Russians in various parts of Europe. Drawing a parallel, it’s implausible to believe that Europeans would strip rights from the significant Palestinian diaspora within the EU, or deny them access to banking and other services, following a harsh assault on Israeli civilians sanctioned by the Hamas leadership. This, despite the evidence suggesting a much stronger support for Hamas among Palestinian migrants compared to the support for Putin’s actions among Russian expatriates.

In conclusion, for sanctions to be fruitful, they need to be broad-based for economic measures, specific for individual ones, and have compelling mechanisms to ensure third-party nations side with Western objectives. Overlooking these aspects can inadvertently bolster camaraderie between the targeted populace and its leadership, rendering sanctions ineffective or even counterproductive.

It’s our hope that Western democracies, in contrast to their authoritarian adversaries, have the aptitude for reflection and adjustment. Pressures on Putin’s regime need finesse to align with the objectives of both the global community and Ukraine. Transparent, expert dialogues engaging all stakeholders should supplant the outdated bureaucratic measures of yesteryears. We believe our study can play a role in this recalibration.