The report is a comparative socio-political survey conducted in parallel in Russia and five EU countries — Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Poland. Its purpose is to identify citizens’ attitudes towards politics, international relations and readiness for interaction. The surveys were conducted in a representative way for both groups, which allows for a correct comparison of the results.
In terms of core values, profound differences are noticeable. Russian respondents more often support active state intervention in the sphere of migration and freedom of speech, while EU residents tend to oppose restrictions and consider excessive state intervention harmful to the economy.
Attitudes towards the «other side» are predominantly cautious. Negative assessments of the EU prevail among Russians, while negative assessments of Russia prevail among Europeans. At the same time, the motives for sympathy and antipathy differ: Russians appreciate the high standard of living and democratic traditions of Europe, but often give vague answers; Europeans appreciate the culture and nature of Russia, but sharply condemn the war against Ukraine, authoritarianism and discrimination against minorities.
The political background also differs: most Russians support Vladimir Putin’s policies, while in Europe his rating is extremely low. On the issue of the war in Ukraine, Russians are more likely to support compromise or an agreement on Russia’s terms, while Europeans are much less likely to favor such an outcome. Respondents on both sides do not expect relations to seriously improve under any scenario.
On other international topics, differences are also noticeable: Russians are more likely to express sympathy for Palestine, while Europeans are more likely to take a neutral stance. Nevertheless, both sides see potential for cooperation, primarily in the economy. Europeans additionally emphasize the importance of human rights and the joint fight against crime and terrorism.
In terms of civic engagement, Russians are primarily willing to participate in charity, while other forms of participation (volunteering, business, science, culture) evoke less response. Europeans show a more balanced distribution of readiness in various spheres, but among them there are more those who found it difficult to answer.
Overall, the study shows a marked asymmetry of perceptions and attitudes, emphasizing mutual distrust, but at the same time revealing points for possible dialogue and practical interaction.